# ULG hole-detail recheck

Retrieved 1 October 2026; assessment cutoff remains 30 September 2026. No frozen snapshot changed.

## Corrected assessment
The current collar-card wording “Depth / surveys unavailable” is too broad. The September announcement reports campaign depth/dip ranges, gamma surveys on all nine ULG holes and deviation surveys on four. Individual hole-linked records were not recovered in the sources checked. Existence of surveys is not the same as access to their readings.

## Verified September campaign information
- Nine RC holes, 1,154m, completed at end July.
- Hole depths 70–200m; dips −60° to −90°.
- 792m (69%) logged as leucogranite; three holes entirely leucogranite.
- Deepest hole ends in leucogranite at 200m downhole, approximately 188m below surface. Its identity is not stated.
- Four-channel gamma-ray spectrometry on all nine holes; four also deviation-surveyed.
- Radiometric values explicitly not reported. Drill chemical assays pending at announcement date. Drill sections promised with subsequent assay disclosure.

These are campaign-level facts. Do not assign ranges, the deepest-hole identity, or three all-leucogranite holes to individual map symbols. Lithological continuity is not a graded uranium interval.

## Retrieval and checks
- September 14 issuer HTML and official seven-page PDF checked. No additional collar/interval appendix recovered; embedded maps remain small raster images, with no individual depth/dip table in text.
- Full corporate presentation (42 pages), currently linked by issuer: https://static-media.fluxio.cloud/arkle/M68zWCjK_2.pdf . Programme pages describe planned drilling; no completed ULG hole-linked table recovered. Current download capture date does not establish its original publication date.
- July AGM/IMC presentation (18 pages): https://static-media.fluxio.cloud/arkle/dQl7df7Q.pdf . Pages 11–13 reviewed, including rendered maps on 11–12. Five ULG holes brought forward was a July plan, superseded by nine completed in September. Map symbols on these slides are surface samples, not a new ULG collar table.
- July 17 RNS: https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/rns/arkle-resources-cdi---ark/namibia-uranium-drilling-underway/9673552 . Interim paleochannel results, no completed ULG per-hole records recovered.
- Targeted searches for ULG, collar tables, R001/R004/R006/R009, drill sections and issuer presentation PDFs returned the same disclosures or unrelated projects. Syndicated announcements are not independent technical evidence.
- Issuer-published StockBox interview excerpt found via LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/arkle-resources-plc_ark-activity-7505934172780310529-PukH . Search-visible transcript repeats lithological continuity almost 200m and assays pending. Full interview not reviewed; no claim of exhaustive media coverage.

## Guidance → question → evidence → finding → viewer implication
Active repository drill-results extraction guidance requires hole-ID joins for collar, survey and interval records; missing fields remain explicit. Question: can each recovered ULG map collar receive a supported underground trace? Evidence above supplies group ranges but not each hole’s depth, azimuth and inclination or survey readings. Finding: no per-hole trajectory can yet be constructed from recovered evidence. Implication: show richer campaign facts next to the map, and replace the broad unavailable label with “Per-hole depth / orientation not disclosed in recovered sources; surveys reported”. An unnamed deepest-hole depth schematic can be shown separately, without selecting an invented collar or representing a mineralised interval.

## Remaining dataset dependency
Collar table (ID, original CRS, easting/northing/elevation, final depth, azimuth/dip), deviation readings keyed by ID and measured depth, lithology intervals and gamma curves/calibration; assay table and announced drill sections when disclosed. No unsupported geographic trace added.