Arkle Resources Uranium exploration

87 holes2,712 m detailed campaign total

Period ended July 2026 · Reported 14 September 2026

No MREUranium portfolio pre-resource

Reported 14 September 2026

Explore the evidence Market context

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing · Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Ownership announcement; September detailed campaign and pre-resource status

Public evidence foundation · Company review pending · Market data through 29 September 2026

Project map & source

ERONGO / EPL 8995Published plan

Source figure · no surveyed registration14 Sep 2026

01 / THE PARTNERSHIP OPENING

The opportunity. The evidence still needed.

Opportunity

Arkle’s strongest opening is a campaign room that joins the ULG trenches, drilling, chemical assays and calibrated gamma logs. The public maps already explain where work occurred. The first private transfer can make each result traceable from sample and downhole survey to its interpretation.

Trench and surface assays, geological mapping and completed reconnaissance drilling provide several evidence types to test together.
Recoverable historical intervals and mapped targets provide a starting point for reviewing the next programme.

Ownership and supporting evidence

85% ownership; obligations separate

Reported 29 January 2026 · Acquisition and contractual terms announced; payment deadlines are contractual, not proof of current unpaid balances

Arkle acquired 85% of Namibia Uranium, holding EPLs 8995, 8290, 8298 and 7986. Retain the 15% minority separately and request its funding/carry rights; the public acquisition summary does not establish a free carry.

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Acquisition and consideration sections

What needs proving

No Mineral Resource has been estimated on these uranium licences. Surface samples, logged leucogranite and visual carnotite cannot establish subsurface uranium grade or continuity. September drilling assays remain pending in the latest recovered disclosure; neighbouring deposits are geological context only.

Drilling assays, calibrated gamma interpretation and complete hole records remain unresolved.
Current title and approval instruments, acquisition obligations and next-programme funding need dated confirmation.
Selected samples, conflicting totals and incomplete coordinate metadata limit what the public evidence can establish.

Evidence limits and unresolved questions

A uranium exploration portfolio

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

The 14 September announcement expressly says no Mineral Resource has been estimated on any of Arkle’s licences in the uranium discussion. This spotlight does not transfer Stonepark’s separate zinc resource into the uranium portfolio.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Deposit Style and Regional Analogues

Campaign and sample reconciliation

Reported 25 June 2026 · 62 collected; 45 submitted on 19 June 2026

Reported 14 September 2026 · September assay populations and selected surface footprint

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later 62-submitted statement; population reconciliation unresolved

Reported 14 September 2026 · Detailed completed programme and host-rock observations

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later approximately 2,900 m summary; unresolved against the 2,712 m detailed total

unresolved

2, 712 m detailed drilling versus around 2, 900 m interim; 1, 558 m palaeochannel drilling versus 1, 559 m logged; “87 vertical” versus inclined ULG holes; 974 samples described ambiguously; 403 combined surface samples versus 242 current field + 178 historical = 420. Do not resolve these by averaging. June 62 collected/45 submitted versus interim 62 submitted; September map 362 versus text 358 ppm. Interim option closing row also inconsistent.

Next evidence: Unique hole and sample manifests with final metres, campaign linkage and QA/QC flags.

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target · Interim Results · Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing

Sources & basis

Complete drill / assay / survey package

issuer data required

Public maps and programme totals recovered; no complete machine-readable collar, downhole survey, assay or geological interval tables.

Next evidence: All 87 modern holes plus legacy database; certified assays and survey control.

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Gamma calibration and disequilibrium

issuer data required

GRS method and sampling threshold disclosed; raw counts, correction/calibration files and eU/chemical comparison unavailable.

Next evidence: Raw gamma channels, processing metadata, calibration pits/standards, borehole correction and disequilibrium tests.

Sources & basis

Underlying technical report

unresolved

Acquisition budgets an updated NI 43-101 report. Issuer site, presentation, archive and targeted searches did not recover the underlying Namibia report. This does not prove it is private or does not exist.

Next evidence: Existing and updated technical reports, authors, dates, referenced historical sources and appendices.

Reported 29 January 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗

Current EPL / ECC / ownership instruments

partially closed

8995 dossier recovered: 8026 history, conditional preparedness notice, expired old ECC and mismatched 8024 heritage consent. Current certified titles/ECCs and holder/commodity endorsements remain missing across all four licences.

Next evidence: Current titles, renewal/transfer documents, nuclear-fuel mineral endorsements, conditions, minority and royalty agreements.

Reported 2025 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 2022 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 1 August 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 23 August 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf · EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf · EPL8290 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment · 2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_NHC Consent_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf

Independent geographic control

partially closed

Terrain and satellite align using provider CRS. Exploration drawings remain source-local; Bessel grant versus WGS 84 map and unstated issuer CRS prevent validated overlays.

Next evidence: Native GIS, datum/projection/epoch and at least independent surveyed holdout controls for each drawing; elevation datum.

Reported 1 August 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported December 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_Map_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target

Sources & basis

02 / PROJECTS & MATURITY

Pre-resource, with evidence at different stages.

Erongo uranium portfolio

85% interest in Namibia Uranium (Pty) Ltd, which holds four EPLs. Portfolio area is reported as 540 km²; licence-level boundaries and current certificates require confirmation.

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Project overview / tenure discussion

EPL 8995 — Drilling campaign

Drill-tested · assays pending

EPL 8995 • ULG

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

9 holes · 1,154 m

Next evidence milestone
Receive drilling assays and link them to the trench and lithology records.

Unresolved dependency
Hole-level collars, surveys, final depths and sample records are missing.

Status, sources & detailed evidence

9 RC holes / 1,154 m; trench/surface assays reported; drilling assays pending

Source date: 2026-09-14
Evidence reviewed: Through 30 September 2026
Resource: No resource established
Study: Exploration; no economic study established
Permissions: Current title and environmental approvals require confirmation

9 RC holes / 1,154 m; trench/surface assays reported; drilling assays pending

Permissions: Current licence and environmental-clearance documents required; old submissions are not current approval.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — ULG drilling and trench sections

Geological evidence, not an inventory

Period ended July 2026 · Completed drilling campaign; precise completion day not disclosed

Reported 14 September 2026 · Detailed completed programme and host-rock observations

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later approximately 2,900 m summary; unresolved against the 2,712 m detailed total

Surface work defines a reported ULG footprint about 1.5 km by 0.6 km. Drilling logs indicate leucogranite to about 188 m below surface. The depth describes host rock occurrence; it is not a uranium-grade interval, and the footprint is not a tonnage estimate.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching; Deposit Style; ULG Drill Holes

Trench and surface assays

Reported 14 September 2026 · Sampling, laboratory results or interpretation; exact individual observation dates not disclosed

14 trenches total 1,973 m; the analytical batch includes 213 trench samples, 29 nearby surface samples and 29 QA/QC inserts (271 total). Peak reported results are 358 ppm U₃O₈ in trenches and 800 ppm in a surface pavement sample. Selective results are not bulk deposit grades.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching, Mapping and Surface Geochemistry

Assays and gamma estimates stay separate

Reported 14 September 2026 · Sampling, laboratory results or interpretation; exact individual observation dates not disclosed

The issuer converts laboratory elemental U to U₃O₈ using 1.17924. Equivalent uranium (eU₃O₈) derives from gamma measurements and requires calibration and disequilibrium assessment. The 40 ppm eU₃O₈ threshold selected samples; it is not a resource cut-off.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Assay conversion; Paleochannel Drilling; downhole spectrometry

Campaign total

Period ended July 2026 · Completed drilling campaign; precise completion day not disclosed

Reported 14 September 2026 · Detailed completed programme and host-rock observations

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later approximately 2,900 m summary; unresolved against the 2,712 m detailed total

The detailed 14 September breakdown is 87 holes / 2,712 m: ULG 9 / 1,154 m; Paleo East 66 / 1,390 m; Paleo West 12 / 168 m. The interim’s “around 2,900 metres” is inconsistent; use the detailed total pending company reconciliation.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target · Interim Results — 14 September drill breakdown; 16 September highlights

Do not model 87 vertical holes

Period ended July 2026 · Completed drilling campaign; precise completion day not disclosed

Reported 14 September 2026 · Detailed completed programme and host-rock observations

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later approximately 2,900 m summary; unresolved against the 2,712 m detailed total

The announcement initially calls the programme vertical, but later gives ULG dips of −60° to −90° and downhole deviation surveys for only four ULG holes. Per-hole collars, orientations and surveys are missing, so this demo creates no downhole traces.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Paleochannel Drilling versus ULG Drill Holes Completed

Assays still pending in the recovered record

Reported 14 September 2026 · No drilling assays received

Target announced 16 September 2026 · Results expected within the next 20 days; a forecast, not receipt of results

On 14 September no drilling assays had been received. The 16 September interim expected results within the next 20 days. No later assay release was recovered by the cutoff search; an expected reporting window is not an assay result.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target · Interim Results — Downhole assays statement; CEO interim comment

Selected assays do not describe an average grade

Reported 25 June 2026 · 62 collected; 45 submitted on 19 June 2026

Reported 14 September 2026 · September assay populations and selected surface footprint

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later 62-submitted statement; population reconciliation unresolved

September reports 39 results >100 ppm U₃O₈, 26 from trenches; 13 >200 ppm, five from trenches. The 077° corridor (1, 140×91 m) uses a 200 ppm selection threshold. It is a selected surface footprint, not a resource envelope. Earlier June work collected 62 trench samples but submitted 45 on 19 June with controls; the interim describes 62 submitted. Recover the dispatch manifest before equating collected, submitted and reported populations.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target · Namibia Uranium Exploration Update · Interim Results — Trenching and geochemistry sections

Figure labels retain their own values

Reported 14 September 2026 · Sampling, laboratory results or interpretation; exact individual observation dates not disclosed

The September ULG map labels an eastern point 362 ppm U₃O₈, while the text reports 358 ppm as the trench maximum and the figure includes an 800 ppm callout. The map also labels 358 elsewhere. The reconstruction retains source categories and treats point identities/sample types as unknown where not explicitly linked; it does not silently reconcile 362 with 358. The 362 ppm point may be a surface result; this is a sample-linkage question, not a demonstrated error in the trench maximum.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Second figure versus Trenching prose

8026 →8995: history supported, current title unresolved

As at 1 August 2023 · Preparedness notice acceptance; not an issued title

Reported 18 December 2023 · Historical environmental report

The December 2023 environmental report says EPL 8026 was re-registered as 8995 for nuclear commodities. The attachment called “MME Grant” is a notice of preparedness to grant, accepted 1 August 2023, with environmental prerequisites before issuance. Its three-year term is tied to ECC issuance. It is not proof of a current issued or transferred title.

Sources & basis

2555_ESR_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — ESR PDFp 12; MME attachment PDFpp 1–4

The dossier is not a current approval pack

As at 17 October 2022 · Old 8026 certificate issued; expiry 17 October 2025

As at 23 August 2023 · Unrelated 8024 heritage consent; expiry 22 August 2024

Reported 19 January 2024 · Application screening only

The old certificate names 8026 and ran 17 October 2022–17 October 2025. January 2024 screening verifies the application and requests documents; it does not grant clearance. The attached heritage consent 119/2023/135 names EPL 8024/Parkland Energy Resources and expired 22 August 2024, so it cannot evidence 8995 heritage consent. No adverse compliance finding is inferred from missing current records.

Sources & basis

2555_ECC Old_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_NHC Consent_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_Screening Notice_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — OldECC p 1; NHC pp 1–3; screening pp 1–2

Two coordinate references cannot be merged by appearance

Reported 1 August 2023 · Bessel reference in historical notice

Reported December 2023 · WGS84 site map

Reported 14 September 2026 · Issuer map with incomplete CRS metadata

The grant attachment specifies Bessel 1841 and Albers Conic Equal Area (central meridian 17°E); the December 2023 site map specifies GCS WGS 1984. Issuer ULG map grid numbers lack a complete CRS statement. Native digitisation stays in source pixels and its grid fit is internal only; no surveyed-coordinate or current-boundary accuracy is claimed.

Sources & basis

2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_Map_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Grant pp 5–8; site map; second figure

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — ULG drilling and trench sections

Drilled · chemical validation pending

EPL 8995 • Paleo East

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

66 holes · 1,390 m

Next evidence milestone
Reconcile modern samples with the historical gamma intervals.

Unresolved dependency
Calibrated gamma, chemical assays and historical hole identities remain incomplete.

Status, sources & detailed evidence

66 holes / 1,390 m; shallow palaeochannel exploration

Source date: 2026-09-14
Evidence reviewed: Through 30 September 2026
Resource: No resource established
Study: Exploration; no economic study established
Permissions: Current title and environmental approvals require confirmation

66 holes / 1,390 m; shallow palaeochannel exploration

Permissions: Current licence and environmental-clearance documents required; old submissions are not current approval.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Eastern paleochannel drilling

Palaeochannel sampling

Reported 14 September 2026 · Sampling, laboratory results or interpretation; exact individual observation dates not disclosed

Paleo East contributes 21 holes and 196 samples selected from gamma response; Paleo West contributes one hole and eight samples. Combined palaeochannel sampling is 204, plus approximately 10% QA/QC inserts. All 78 palaeochannel holes are reported as vertical.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Eastern and Western Paleochannel Target Drilled

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Eastern paleochannel drilling

Drilled · interpretation pending

EPL 8995 • Paleo West

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

12 holes · 168 m

Next evidence milestone
Test the palaeochannel interpretation against assays and logged intervals.

Unresolved dependency
Visual mineralogy does not establish uranium grade or continuity.

Status, sources & detailed evidence

12 holes / 168 m; palaeochannel exploration

Source date: 2026-09-14
Evidence reviewed: Through 30 September 2026
Resource: No resource established
Study: Exploration; no economic study established
Permissions: Current title and environmental approvals require confirmation

12 holes / 168 m; palaeochannel exploration

Permissions: Current licence and environmental-clearance documents required; old submissions are not current approval.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Western paleochannel drilling

Visual geology is not a grade

Reported 14 September 2026 · Sampling, laboratory results or interpretation; exact individual observation dates not disclosed

Carnotite was visually logged in six holes across eight intervals at downhole depths of 1–22 m. Chemical assays are needed to establish uranium content. Keep logged mineralogy separate from analytical and radiometric results.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Paleochannel Lithology and Mineralisation

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Western paleochannel drilling

Further Erongo licences

Target generation

EPL 8290

Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Geophysics + surface evidence

Next evidence milestone
Rank mapped anomalies using complete coverage and follow-up sampling.

Unresolved dependency
Survey data, target identities and ground validation remain incomplete.

Status, sources & detailed evidence

Geophysical / surface targets; no separate modern drill result established

Source date: 2026-05-22
Evidence reviewed: Through 30 September 2026
Resource: No resource established
Study: Exploration; no economic study established
Permissions: Current title and environmental approvals require confirmation

Geophysical / surface targets; no separate modern drill result established

Permissions: Current licence and environmental-clearance documents required; old submissions are not current approval.

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Phase 1 interpretation and further targets

Targets beyond EPL 8995

Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

The May interpretation integrates airborne magnetics/radiometrics, HLEM and 2025 geochemistry across 8995, 8290 and 8298. Further mapping, sampling and geophysics were planned to develop other targets. No licence-level resource or economic case follows from those targets.

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Phase 1 results and next steps

2025 campaign

Period ended 2025 · 2025 sampling campaign; exact sampling dates not disclosed

Reported 29 January 2026 · 178 samples and selected sample maxima

The acquisition describes 178 samples from pits about 0.35–0.5 m deep. Combined 8995/8290 maxima were 2,782 ppm U₃O₈ in calcrete and 3,855 ppm in alaskite candidates. Preparation and multi-element analysis are described, but native sample records and QA/QC results are missing.

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — About Namibia Uranium; 2025 sampling and laboratory method

Survey resolution and coverage matter

Target announced 23 February 2026 · Four planned HLEM profiles

Reported 1 April 2026 · Completed airborne survey and three HLEM profiles; historical government survey date not disclosed

Reported 22 May 2026 · Later interpretation

The completed airborne programme was 12, 376 line-km at 50 m line spacing, compared with 200 m historical government data. April reports three completed HLEM profiles; February 23 had planned four. Northern 8995/8290/8298 coverage must not be transferred to 7986. Radiometric response mainly constrains near-surface uranium and HLEM conductivity supports an interpreted channel geometry; neither establishes uranium grade or mineralised thickness.

Sources & basis

Company Updates · Uranium Updates - Geophysical Surveys Complete · Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Planned work, completed surveys and Phase 1 interpretation

Anomaly count needs a feature register

Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

May describes four prominent eastern 8290 uranium anomalies; its detailed U/Th discussion confirms three, while the headline implies all four. Preserve both statements. Western anomalies and central palaeochannel extents are targets, not resources.

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Phase 1 highlights versus Targeting Other Paleochannels

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Phase 1 interpretation and further targets

Target generation

EPL 8298

Source · p. 1 ↗

Reported 12 May 2025 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Regional maps + waypoints

Next evidence milestone
Reconcile environmental waypoints, exploration targets and current tenure.

Unresolved dependency
Published waypoints are not surveyed collars; current permissions remain unconfirmed.

Status, sources & detailed evidence

Geophysical / surface targets; 2025 environmental target waypoints recovered

Source date: 2025
Evidence reviewed: Through 30 September 2026
Resource: No resource established
Study: Exploration; no economic study established
Permissions: Current title and environmental approvals require confirmation

Geophysical / surface targets; 2025 environmental target waypoints recovered

Permissions: Current licence and environmental-clearance documents required; old submissions are not current approval.

Source · p. 1 ↗

Sources & basis

5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF pp1–2,8 Table 2

106 legacy holes, separate from modern drilling

Reported 1 April 2026 · 95 accessible historical holes

Reported 22 May 2026 · About 50 of 95 planned holes logged

Reported 25 June 2026 · 106 historical holes logged; original drilling dates not disclosed

April identified 95 accessible historical holes; May had logged about 50 of 95 planned. June reports 106 legacy holes logged across EPL 8995 and 8298 with a four-channel spectrometer. Sixteen returned >50 ppm eU₃O₈ over ≥1 m and seven >100 ppm. Original operators, collars and analytical provenance remain unresolved; neither the 95 nor 106 is the modern 87-hole programme.

Source · p. 8 ↗Source · p. 8 ↗

Sources & basis

Uranium Updates - Geophysical Surveys Complete · Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated · Namibia Uranium Exploration Update — Legacy downhole gamma sections

Public government-submission coordinates

Reported 12 May 2025 · EMP cover release date for both waypoint tables; field observation dates not disclosed

The May 2025 EPL 8298 EMP lists 18 target waypoints in three clusters; the 7986 EMP lists nine. They are exploration target points, not certified assays or drill collars. Coordinate datum is not explicitly attached to the tables; use source-local coordinate views until surveyed control is supplied.

Sources & basis

5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf · EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — Both EMPs PDF p8 Table 2

Old certificate is not current approval

As at 2 November 2022 · 8298 historical certificate issued; expired 2 November 2025

As at 18 August 2025 · 7986 historical certificate expiry; no current approval established

Reported 12 May 2025 · Renewal/amendment submission dates

The recovered old EPL 8298 environmental certificate was issued 2 November 2022 and expired 2 November 2025; EPL 7986’s expired 18 August 2025. The 2025 documents are renewal/amendment submissions. Current certificates and holder/commodity endorsements have not been independently recovered.

Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗

Sources & basis

5739_ECC Old_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf · EPL7986 5719_ECC Old_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf · 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf · EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — Old ECC PDFs p1; EMP document data sheets

Government map has internal inconsistencies

Reported 12 May 2025 · EMP release date, not a current title verification

The 8298 EMP locality map labels neighbouring EPL 8026 rather than current portfolio EPL 8995, and labels a metre-like grid as decimal degrees. Preserve the source figure as historical context; do not use it as a current legal boundary or geographic registration control.

Source · p. 9 ↗

Sources & basis

5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p9 Figure 1

Source · p. 1 ↗

Sources & basis

5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF pp1–2,8 Table 2

Early surface target

EPL 7986 • North Rössing

Source · p. 21 ↗

Reported 2 April 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

North Rössing

Next evidence milestone
Validate selected historical surface results and map geological controls.

Unresolved dependency
Sample representativeness, current tenure and the 2,924/2,923 ppm discrepancy remain unresolved.

Open native SVG fallback · Download all native geometry · Open full source image ↗

Status, sources & detailed evidence

Selective historical surface samples; early primary uranium target

Source date: 2026-04-02
Evidence reviewed: Through 30 September 2026
Resource: No resource established
Study: Exploration; no economic study established
Permissions: Current title and environmental approvals require confirmation

Selective historical surface samples; early primary uranium target

Permissions: Current licence and environmental-clearance documents required; old submissions are not current approval.

Source · p. 21 ↗

Sources & basis

Corporate presentation linked from uranium page — PDF pp21,23

North Rössing remains its own early target

Reported 29 January 2026 · Selected historical samples; sampling dates not disclosed

Reported 2 April 2026 · Presentation values and selected subset; not a new resource estimate

The acquisition and presentation tabulate 500–2,923 ppm U₃O₈ across selected 7986 samples. Presentation p23 instead highlights a 2,480 ppm subset. Do not silently replace one maximum with the other or infer deposit scale from proximity to Rössing.

Source ↗Source · p. 21 ↗

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing · Corporate presentation linked from uranium page — Acquisition sampling table; presentation PDF pp21,23

Source · p. 21 ↗

Sources & basis

Corporate presentation linked from uranium page — PDF pp21,23

03 / EXPLORE THE EVIDENCE

Explore Erongo’s evidence.

Licence Target / evidence

Loading evidence scene…

Layers & appearance

Layer visibility

Appearance

Compare opacity Feature labels

Sources, methods & downloads

Drill columns ↓

Scroll vertically to zoom at the pointer; horizontally or with Shift to pan. Drag uses Pan or Orbit. Pinch zooms. Arrow keys move; + / − zoom. Esc closes expanded view.

Reported 14 September 2026 · Shared date for the trench metrics below; sampling dates not disclosed

14 trenches1,973 m total

1–1.5 mReported excavation depth

255 stationsGeology mapped on floors and walls

213 samplesTrench field samples

29 samplesNearby surface field samples

29 insertsQA/QC; 271 analytical entries total

September 2026: 26 trench samples exceeded 100 ppm U₃O₈; five exceeded 200 ppm. Reported maxima: 358 ppm in trench samples and 800 ppm in a surface pavement sample. Selected results are not average deposit grades. ULG was logged at 48 of 255 geological stations; full station and channel logs were not recovered.

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching, Mapping and Surface Geochemistry

HISTORICAL DRILLING · JUNE 2026 GAMMA SURVEY

Reported intervals, on a shared depth scale

Five named intervals recovered. These are downhole depth logs, linked to recovered source-map symbols where available; they are not underground trajectories. Grey dashed guides indicate the display scale; they do not assert total hole depth or barren ground.

Reported 25 June 2026 · Historical gamma-derived intervals; original drilling dates not disclosed

Select a column to read its interval and evidence limits. Gamma-derived uranium estimates remain subject to chemical validation.

Hole register CSV · Hole register JSON · Depth-log SVG · June primary announcement ↗

Why the modern holes are not underground traces yet

The ULG campaign reports nine holes, depths of 70–200 m and dips of −60° to −90°, with four deviation surveys. Individual collar, elevation, orientation, total-depth and survey rows were not recovered. Programme ranges cannot be assigned to named holes. The map symbols remain selectable while those fields remain null in the hole register.

Accessible evidence tables & source figures

The tables and original figures remain usable without the 3D renderer. Flat map planes do not imply terrain or a subsurface model.

Open accessible plan SVG

campaignTotals

Dated evidence · Shared disclosure: 14 September 2026
id	holes	metres	resultState	Evidence	Date & basis
ULG	9	1154	Drill chemical assays pending	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — ULG Drill Holes Completed	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
Paleo East	66	1390	Drill chemical assays pending	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Eastern Paleochannel Target Drilled	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
Paleo West	12	168	Drill chemical assays pending	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Western Paleochannel Target Drilled	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗

targetWaypoints

Dated evidence · Dates below distinguish source disclosures from observation periods
id	licence	sourceLabel	latitude	longitude	datum	type	elevation	date	Evidence	Date & basis
8298-1-A	8298	1-A	-22.036191	14.86962	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-1-B	8298	1-B	-22.034198	14.869904	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-1-C	8298	1-C	-22.034678	14.872503	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-A	8298	2-A	-22.031513	14.874611	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-B	8298	2-B	-22.031139	14.874271	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-C	8298	2-C	-22.031116	14.875401	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-D	8298	2-D	-22.030949	14.876294	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-E	8298	2-E	-22.030254	14.876158	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-F	8298	2-F	-22.028525	14.874768	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-G	8298	2-G	-22.027095	14.874425	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-H	8298	2-H	-22.026486	14.874484	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-I	8298	2-I	-22.025154	14.876579	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-2-unlabelled-row	8298	2-unlabelled-row	-22.025743	14.876494	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-3-A	8298	3-A	-22.031589	14.866499	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-3-B	8298	3-B	-22.030806	14.86661	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-3-C	8298	3-C	-22.030525	14.868364	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-3-D	8298	3-D	-22.029415	14.87055	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
8298-3-E	8298	3-E	-22.029962	14.869459	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis 5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-A	7986	A	-22.458127	15.073486	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-B	7986	B	-22.458746	15.073584	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-C	7986	C	-22.459074	15.075972	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-D	7986	D	-22.456243	15.078148	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-E	7986	E	-22.455433	15.078349	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-F	7986	F	-22.455036	15.078387	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-G	7986	G	-22.454282	15.079776	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-H	7986	H	-22.453246	15.080159	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗
7986-I	7986	I	-22.452799	15.079364	Not explicit on coordinate table; unvalidated	Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar	—	2025-05-12	Sources & basis EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf — PDF p8 Table 2	Reported 12 May 2025 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 8 ↗

surfaceSummaries

Dated evidence · Shared disclosure: 14 September 2026
id	fieldSamples	peak	unit	inserts	Evidence	Date & basis
trench	213	358	ppm U3O8	—	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching geochemistry	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
surface	29	800	ppm U3O8	—	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching geochemistry	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
qaqc	—	—	—	29	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching geochemistry	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗

tenure

Dated evidence · Dates below distinguish source disclosures from observation periods
id	heldThrough	arkleInterest_pct	minorityInterest_pct	currentTitleVerification	currentECC	instrument	status	date	expiry	Evidence	Date & basis
EPL8995	Namibia Uranium Pty Ltd	85	15	Not independently recovered	Replacement/current certificate required	—	—	—	—	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Acquisition and Namibia Uranium licence portfolio	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
EPL8290	Namibia Uranium Pty Ltd	85	15	Not independently recovered	Replacement/current certificate required	—	—	—	—	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Acquisition and Namibia Uranium licence portfolio	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
EPL8298	Namibia Uranium Pty Ltd	85	15	Not independently recovered	Replacement/current certificate required	—	—	—	—	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Acquisition and Namibia Uranium licence portfolio	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
EPL7986	Namibia Uranium Pty Ltd	85	15	Not independently recovered	Replacement/current certificate required	—	—	—	—	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Acquisition and Namibia Uranium licence portfolio	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
8026-old	—	—	—	—	—	EPL8026 old environmental certificate	Expired historical instrument	2022-10-17	2025-10-17	Sources & basis 2555_ECC Old_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — PDF p1	Reported 17 October 2022 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 1 ↗
8995-readiness	—	—	—	—	—	EPL8995 preparedness notice	Conditional notice; acceptance, not final title	2023-08-01	—	Sources & basis 2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — PDF pp1–4	Reported 1 August 2023 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 1 ↗
8995-screening	—	—	—	—	—	APP002555 screening	Application verified; documents requested	2024-01-19	—	Sources & basis 2555_Screening Notice_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — PDF pp1–2	Reported 19 January 2024 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 1 ↗
nhc-mismatch	—	—	—	—	—	NHC119/2023/135 EPL8024 Parkland	Unrelated licence/holder; exclude as8995approval	2023-08-23	2024-08-22	Sources & basis 2555_NHC Consent_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — PDF pp1–3	Reported 23 August 2023 · Date recorded in source; not a new survey or current title verification Source · p. 1 ↗

financialFacts

Dated evidence · Dates below distinguish source disclosures from observation periods
id	value	unit	period	basis	Evidence	Date & basis
cash-period-end	1069000	EUR	2026-06-30	Balance	Sources & basis Interim Results — Statement of financial position	As at 30 June 2026 · Cash balance Source ↗
cash-current-disclosure	650000	EUR	2026-09-16	Approximate issuer figure; not Sep30 treasury balance	Sources & basis Interim Results — Corporate highlights	Reported 16 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
operating-cash-use	147000	EUR	H1 2026	Cash outflow	Sources & basis Interim Results — Cash-flow statement	Period ended 30 June 2026 · Six months ended Source ↗
investing-outflow	1590000	EUR	H1 2026	Includes exploration/acquisition spending; not recurring run rate	Sources & basis Interim Results — Cash-flow statement	Period ended 30 June 2026 · Six months ended Source ↗
financing-inflow	2498000	EUR	H1 2026	Cash inflow	Sources & basis Interim Results — Cash-flow statement	Period ended 30 June 2026 · Six months ended Source ↗
initial-vendor-cash	375000	GBP	Acquisition2026	Contractual initial consideration	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Consideration	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
deferred-2026	242000	GBP	Due2026-12-31	Deferred cash; do not assume unpaid without confirmation	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Consideration	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
deferred-2027	195000	GBP	Due2027-12-31	Deferred cash	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Consideration	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
resource-trigger	390000	GBP	Conditional acceleration	Subset of deferred cash, not additional consideration	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Consideration footnote	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
placing-gross	1700000	GBP	2026-01-29	Gross funding separate from acquisition price	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Fundraise	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
options	130000000	options	2026-04-02	0.95p exercise price; replaces prior management/director options	Sources & basis Warrant Exercise, Director Shareholdings & Options — Grant of share options	As at 1 April 2026 · Option transaction date in the PDMR appendix Reported 2 April 2026 · 130m options announced; interim narrative instead says granted on 2 April Source ↗

analyticalMethods

Dated evidence · Dates below distinguish source disclosures from observation periods
id	dataset	method	qaqc	unit	Evidence	Date & basis
2025-surface	2025 shallow pit samples	Issuer describes ACTLabs ME-MS61U, 4-acid digestion, 0.25g split, ICP-MS/ICP-AES; verify exact package against certificates	Native certificates and QA/QC results not recovered	U3O8 ppm as reported	Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — 2025 sampling laboratory paragraph	Reported 29 January 2026 · Contract terms or ownership announcement; future due dates retained in the period field Source ↗
2026-trench	Trench / surface analytical batch	Actlabs56-element ICP; elemental U converted toU3O8 ×1.17924	29 QAQC inserts in271 entries; certified U references and blanks described, acceptance results absent	U3O8 ppm chemical result	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Trenching, Mapping and Surface Geochemistry	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
2026-gamma	87 drillholes downhole spectrometry	Four-channel GRS by Terratec;40ppm eU3O8 sample-selection envelope	Calibration, borehole corrections and disequilibrium information not supplied	eU3O8 radiometric estimate; raw grades not disclosed	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Paleochannel sampling; downhole gamma statement	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
2026-drill-assays	Selected drill samples	ICP-MS at Actlabs Canada; preparation in Namibia	Assays pending at latest recovered disclosure; counts require reconciliation	Chemical assays pending	Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Paleochannel Assay samples and ULG section	Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗

legacyGamma

Dated evidence · Dates below distinguish source disclosures from observation periods
id	fromM	toM	lengthM	grade	units	licence	reportedGrade	Evidence	Date & basis
RC28	6.5	7.5	1	303	ppm eU3O8	not assigned per-hole in text	—	Sources & basis Namibia Uranium Exploration Update — Legacy gamma results; chemical assay unconfirmed	Reported 25 June 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
RC27	15.5	17.5	2	215	ppm eU3O8	not assigned per-hole in text	—	Sources & basis Namibia Uranium Exploration Update — Legacy gamma results; chemical assay unconfirmed	Reported 25 June 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗
central-east unnamed	—	—	9.4	—	ppm eU3O8	—	>100	Sources & basis Namibia Uranium Exploration Update — Legacy gamma results; depth not reported	Reported 25 June 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed Source ↗

ULG · samples, trenches & collar symbols. Native reconstruction in source pixels. Grade marks preserve source colour classes; numeric bin edges are not confidently legible; rendered marks are not a sample census. No drill trajectories or subsurface grades. Internal grid spacing ≈3.97 m/pixel; geographic CRS remains unverified.
Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed
Source ↗
Sources & basis
Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — ULG surface-geochemistry map (second figure)

Paleo East · HLEM profiles. Digitised HLEM line paths are plan-view source features, not underground channel models. Conductivity and depth interpretation do not establish uranium grades.
Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed
Source ↗
Sources & basis
Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Figure headed EPL 8995 East HLEM Lines

ULG / Paleo West · HLEM profile. Published central HLEM line and ULG outline in their own source frame; May interpretation cannot be registered to September collars from visual similarity.

Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Figure headed EPL 8995 Central Target

EPL 8290 · regional geophysical context. Native licence outline digitised for dated context only. Response raster is retained in Original/Compare; numerical geophysics cannot be recovered from its colour image.
Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed
Source ↗
Sources & basis
Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Figure headed Exclusive Prospecting Licences Primary Target Areas

EPL 8995 • ULG / Paleo East / Paleo West. Published plan in source-pixel coordinates. Selection markers identify approximate target areas, not surveyed collars or legal boundaries.
Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed
Source ↗
Sources & basis
Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Programme location figure (first figure)

Four licences • issuer regional context. April 2026 issuer regional map, source-local only. Nearby deposits are contextual and do not demonstrate an Arkle resource.
Reported 2 April 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed
Source · p. 18 ↗
Sources & basis
Corporate presentation linked from uranium page — PDF p 18

Source image coverage and accessible native feature catalogue

Partial source reconstruction. Anonymous marks are not a sample or hole census. Coverage checklist

ULG · samples, trenches & collar symbols

ULG surface evidence • September 2026. Select collar symbols, partial trenches and assay marks. Original is visible in Compare. Source-local frame: no surveyed trajectories, collar elevations or geographic registration.

ULG mapped target outline — Visible published target outline, clipped at the left image edge and deliberately not closed. No grade, thickness, tonnage or geological solid inferred.
Visible trench stroke 01 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 02 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 03 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 04 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 05 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 06 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 07 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 08 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Visible trench stroke 09 — Partial published white trench stroke; anonymous display ID, not an issuer trench ID. Overlapping/obscured portions omitted. No from/to or channel widths recoverable.
Published collar R001 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Published collar R002 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Published collar R003 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Published collar R004 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Published collar R005 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Collar R006 / R060 · label ambiguous — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed. Printed hole-label order is ambiguous at source resolution; display ID collar-R006 retained for compatibility.
Published collar R007 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Published collar R008 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Published collar R009 — Approximate visible collar symbol / label association. Collar database, RL and per-hole azimuth are not supplied; no downhole line constructed.
Figure label 800 ppm U₃O₈ — Published callout; individual sample type/ID linkage unavailable. The362ppm map value may be a surface sample and cannot be compared directly with the358ppm trench maximum without that linkage. No issuer error is assumed.
Figure label 358 ppm U₃O₈ — Published callout; individual sample type/ID linkage unavailable. The362ppm map value may be a surface sample and cannot be compared directly with the358ppm trench maximum without that linkage. No issuer error is assumed.
Figure label 362 ppm U₃O₈ — Published callout; individual sample type/ID linkage unavailable. The362ppm map value may be a surface sample and cannot be compared directly with the358ppm trench maximum without that linkage. No issuer error is assumed.
Surface result mark 2 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 4 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 6 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 7 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 8 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 10 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 11 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 12 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 14 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 16 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 17 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 19 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 20 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 21 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 23 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 24 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 25 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 27 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 29 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 30 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 31 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 32 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 33 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 35 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 36 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 37 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 38 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 39 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 41 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 42 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 43 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 44 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 47 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 48 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 51 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 52 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 53 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Surface result mark 54 — Connected coloured mark in the published assay map. Can represent a fragment or merged adjacent marks; not a unique laboratory sample. Source colour retained; exact numeric class is not assigned.
Figure label 146 ppm U₃O₈ — Printed result callout; leader endpoint digitised. Sample identity and support require the original database.
Figure label 307 ppm U₃O₈ — Printed result callout; leader endpoint digitised. Sample identity and support require the original database.
Figure label 278 ppm U₃O₈ — Printed result callout; leader endpoint digitised. Sample identity and support require the original database.
Figure label 180 ppm U₃O₈ — Printed result callout; leader endpoint digitised. Sample identity and support require the original database.

Northern licences · targets & 2025 sampling

Selected 2025 surface results and source target outlines. Sample maxima do not establish representative grade. All shapes remain in the presentation image frame; neighbouring properties are context only.

Published EPL 8298 — Dated presentation outline. Not a current cadastral instrument.
Published EPL 8290 — Dated presentation outline. Not a current cadastral instrument.
Published EPL 8995 — Dated presentation outline. Not a current cadastral instrument.
Target with 434 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.
Target with 337 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.
Target with 518 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.
Target with 467 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.
Target with 496 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.
Target with 3785 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.
Additional source target 1 — Source interpretation; no exact assay assigned.
Additional source target 2 — Source interpretation; no exact assay assigned.
Additional source target 3 — Source interpretation; no exact assay assigned.
Additional source target 4 — Source interpretation; no exact assay assigned.

EPL 8298 · northern targets context

Published EPL 8298 — Dated presentation outline. Not a current cadastral instrument.
Target with 434 ppm U₃O₈ callout — Published target outline associated with selected surface result callout. Outline is not an assay footprint, resource or continuous mineralisation.

North Rössing · licence & dome context

Published EPL7986 outline and Rössing Dome interpretation. Adjacent mine is context; its resource, workings and geology cannot be attributed to Arkle. Source-local map with undated satellite background.

Published EPL 7986 — Published boundary, not a current title survey.
Published Rössing Dome interpretation — Partial dashed dome trace; neighbouring mine context retained. This is a surface interpretation, not a closed subsurface solid.

Paleo East · HLEM profiles

Digitised HLEM line paths are plan-view source features, not underground channel models. Conductivity and depth interpretation do not establish uranium grades.

East HLEM line 1 — Approximate published profile path. Raw observations/inversion and coordinate frame are required for quantitative interpretation.
East HLEM line 2 — Approximate published profile path. Raw observations/inversion and coordinate frame are required for quantitative interpretation.

ULG / Paleo West · HLEM profile

Published central HLEM line and ULG outline in their own source frame; May interpretation cannot be registered to September collars from visual similarity.

Central HLEM profile — Published resistive-basement profile line; 16–17 m annotations are interpretation, not verified mineralised thickness.
May ULG interpretation — May target outline; different vintage toSeptember footprint. No volume inferred.

EPL 8290 · May geophysical original

Native licence outline digitised for dated context only. Response raster is retained in Original/Compare; numerical geophysics cannot be recovered from its colour image.

EPL 8290 historical drawn outline — Approximate map outline, not a current cadastral boundary.

EPL 8298 · environmental target waypoints

Reported latitude/longitude preserved. Relative metric layout about centroid only; datum unspecified. These are target waypoints, not assays or collars.

1-A — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
1-B — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
1-C — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-A — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-B — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-C — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-D — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-E — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-F — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-G — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-H — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-I — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
2-unlabelled-row — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
3-A — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
3-B — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
3-C — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
3-D — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
3-E — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar

EPL 7986 · environmental target waypoints

Reported latitude/longitude preserved. Relative metric layout about centroid only; datum unspecified. These are target waypoints, not assays or collars.

A — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
B — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
C — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
D — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
E — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
F — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
G — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
H — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar
I — Historical exploration target waypoint, not assay or collar

EPL 8995 · 2026 drill fences

September 2026 programme map. Select recoverable collar-symbol fragments in the eastern and western fences; mapped symbols are not a verified hole census. The inset is excluded from digitisation. Individual depths, directions and assays remain unavailable.

ULG — 9 holes / 1, 154 m. Leucogranite host rock observed at depth; drill assays pending.
Paleo East — 66 holes / 1, 390 m. Palaeochannel target; drilling assays pending.
Paleo West — 12 holes / 168 m. Separate western palaeochannel; drilling assays pending.
2026 collar mark 1 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 4 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 5 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 6 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 9 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 11 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 12 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 14 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 18 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 19 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.
2026 collar mark 20 — Anonymous source-symbol fragment. Closely spaced symbols can merge in this low-resolution map; not a surveyed collar or assay. No hole ID assigned.

Four licences • issuer regional context

April 2026 issuer regional map, source-local only. Nearby deposits are contextual and do not demonstrate an Arkle resource.

Erongo · terrain & satellite context

Regional geographic context covering the four-licence area. True elevation scale ×1; exploration drawings remain source-local. Satellite mosaic is dated per contributing scene.

Paleo East · historical collars & intervals

June 2026 gamma survey. Historical collar marks, interpreted channel banks and HLEM traverses. Callout oxide labels omit e; prose identifies gamma-derived equivalent uranium. Geological depth interpretation is not mineralised thickness.

VB05 / VB06 pair — identity association unresolved — Source ring position only. VB05 and VB06 labels overlap; individual ring-to-ID linkage cannot be confidently resolved.
VB05 / VB06 pair — identity association unresolved — Source ring position only. VB05 and VB06 labels overlap; individual ring-to-ID linkage cannot be confidently resolved.
RC08 · historical collar symbol — Ring linked to the RC08 interval callout. No total depth, collar elevation or orientation disclosed.
Probed historical mark 1 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
Probed historical mark 2 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
Probed historical mark 3 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
Probed historical mark 5 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
Probed historical mark 6 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
Probed historical mark 9 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
Probed historical mark 12 — Visible green historical-probe mark; anonymous display ID. No result inferred for this mark.
HLEM traverse 1 — Plan-view traverse; colour profile remains in original. Inversion and calibrated depth grid unavailable.
HLEM traverse 2 — Plan-view traverse; colour profile remains in original. Inversion and calibrated depth grid unavailable.
Published channel / sediment boundary 1 — Partial source-drawn boundary; colour and frame retained. Not a surveyed bank or 3D channel floor.
Published channel / sediment boundary 2 — Partial source-drawn boundary; colour and frame retained. Not a surveyed bank or 3D channel floor.
Published channel / sediment boundary 3 — Partial source-drawn boundary; colour and frame retained. Not a surveyed bank or 3D channel floor.
HLEM depth annotation 12.5 m — Figure annotation is interpreted basement depth. Caption mentions a 12.5 m potential maximum while figure also labels 16 m; retain both without reconciliation.
HLEM depth annotation 16 m — Figure annotation is interpreted basement depth. Caption mentions a 12.5 m potential maximum while figure also labels 16 m; retain both without reconciliation.

Northern licences · regional radiometrics

Government radiometric backdrop in U counts per second (cps), not uranium assay grade. Native licence and target outlines are selected source features; quantitative grid values cannot be recovered from the colour picture.

Published EPL 8298 — Page20 approximate outline. Pixel correspondence checked visually against page20; not georegistration.
Published EPL 8290 — Page20 approximate outline. Pixel correspondence checked visually against page20; not georegistration.
Published EPL 8995 — Page20 approximate outline. Pixel correspondence checked visually against page20; not georegistration.

Paleo East · sample classes & channel banks

2025 selective surface samples, reported in ppm U₃O₈. Native banks and sample classes are source-local. Base imagery acquisition is not disclosed by the presentation.

Published palaeochannel bank 1 — Digitised source red bank interpretation; no independently surveyed position or channel depth.
Published palaeochannel bank 2 — Digitised source red bank interpretation; no independently surveyed position or channel depth.
773 ppm U₃O₈ — Selected 2025 surface sample; exact sample ID and support not provided by this figure.
2782 ppm U₃O₈ — Selected 2025 surface sample; exact sample ID and support not provided by this figure.
1698 ppm U₃O₈ — Selected 2025 surface sample; exact sample ID and support not provided by this figure.
250–500 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
250–500 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
250–500 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.
100–250 ppm surface class — Manually digitised clear coloured sample symbol. Source bin label copied verbatim; boundary inclusivity not stated. No exact grade inferred.

Paleo East · mapped geology

Native flat geological colour fragments from the published map. Gaps preserve labels, contacts and uncertain pixels. Regional formation assignments are source interpretations, not underground surfaces.

Karibib Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Karibib Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Chuos Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Chuos Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Arandis Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Arandis Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Arandis Formation · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Red Granite C · visible fragment — Conservative source-colour fragment, clipped to visible project area. Pixel-classification reconstruction, not new geological interpretation. Unknown and covered pixels excluded.
Published EPL8995 boundary — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 1 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 2 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 3 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 4 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 5 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 6 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 7 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 8 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 9 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 10 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 11 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 12 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 13 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 14 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 15 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 16 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped 2025 sample mark 17 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped bank 1 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.
Mapped bank 2 — Source-local tracing from the page22 geological map; no surveyed coordinates or three-dimensional interpretation.

North Rössing · labelled surface samples

Six labelled surface results. The figure prints 2,924 ppm whereas acquisition prose gives 2,923 ppm; both retained as an unresolved source discrepancy, not averaged.

704 ppm U₃O₈ — Published sample callout; crowded leader associations approximate. Source sample ID absent.
848 ppm U₃O₈ — Published sample callout; crowded leader associations approximate. Source sample ID absent.
2,924 ppm U₃O₈ — Published sample callout; crowded leader associations approximate. Source sample ID absent. Figure2924 vs prose2923 discrepancy unresolved.
450 ppm U₃O₈ — Published sample callout; crowded leader associations approximate. Source sample ID absent.
393 ppm U₃O₈ — Published sample callout; crowded leader associations approximate. Source sample ID absent.
979 ppm U₃O₈ — Published sample callout; crowded leader associations approximate. Source sample ID absent.

EPL 8995 · terrain & satellite

True elevation scale ×1. Camera focus is regional context near the licence, not a surveyed project boundary. No source-local exploration overlay has been placed on the terrain.

EPL 8290 · terrain & satellite

True elevation scale ×1. Camera focus is regional context near the licence, not a surveyed project boundary. No source-local exploration overlay has been placed on the terrain.

EPL 8298 · terrain & satellite

True elevation scale ×1. Camera focus is regional context near the licence, not a surveyed project boundary. No source-local exploration overlay has been placed on the terrain.

EPL 7986 · terrain & satellite

True elevation scale ×1. Camera focus is regional context near the licence, not a surveyed project boundary. No source-local exploration overlay has been placed on the terrain.

04 / DISCLOSURE CHRONOLOGY

What happened, and what remains expected.

Detailed disclosure chronology

2026

Follow-on ULG drilling preparation

Q4 programme being planned; budget, collar plan and actual mobilisation require confirmation.

planned

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — ULG drilling and next steps

2026-10

Expected drilling assay disclosure

16 September interim says within20days, spanning earlyOctober; not yet recovered at cutoff. Original14September guidance was duringSeptember.

planned

Reported 16 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Interim Results · Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — CEO interim statement; technical next steps

2026-09-16

Interim results and cash update

€650k approximate current cash; assay timetable remains expected.

reported

Reported 16 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Interim Results — Dated announcement: Interim results and cash update

2026-09-14

Trench assays and completed drilling

87 holes / 2,712 m; drill assays pending.

reported

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Dated announcement: Trench assays and completed drilling

2026-09-09

Warrant exercise and TVR

£105k; dilution recorded separately.

reported

Reported 9 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Exercise of Warrants — Dated announcement: Warrant exercise and TVR

2026-07-17

Drilling underway

Field progress; visual mineralisation not grade.

reported Source ↗

Sources & basis

Namibia Uranium Drilling Underway — Dated announcement: Drilling underway

2026-06-25

Mapping and trenching update

Advance target selection, not a resource.

reported Source ↗

Sources & basis

Namibia Uranium Exploration Update — Dated announcement: Mapping and trenching update

2026-05-22

Targets defined; drilling accelerated

Separate leucogranite and palaeochannel styles.

reported Source ↗

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated — Dated announcement: Targets defined; drilling accelerated

2026-01-29

Namibia acquisition and placing

85% interest, four EPLs; purchase and exploration budget distinct.

reported

Reported 29 January 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Dated announcement: Namibia acquisition and placing

05 / CORPORATE CONTEXT

Funding and people.

Funding snapshots

Cash at period end

€1.069m

As at 30 June 2026 · €1.069m period-end balance

Unaudited group cash; not a current treasury balance.

Sources & basis

Later cash statement

~€650k

Reported 16 September 2026 · Approximately €650k described as current cash; exact treasury measurement date not separately disclosed

Issuer said the current planned programmes were funded. Expanded programmes require their own budget.

Sources & basis

Placing proceeds

£1.7m gross

Reported 29 January 2026 · Acquisition and contractual terms announced; payment deadlines are contractual, not proof of current unpaid balances

Separate from acquisition consideration; gross fundraising is not cash remaining.

Sources & basis

Acquisition cash still scheduled

£437k

Reported 29 January 2026 · Acquisition and contractual terms announced; payment deadlines are contractual, not proof of current unpaid balances

£242k Dec 2026 · £195k Dec 2027

Subject to the disclosed acceleration terms. Total purchase consideration was £2.032m, including shares.

Sources & basis

Cash used in H1

€1.590m investing

Period ended 30 June 2026 · Six months ended; all cash-flow and loss figures in this claim

Operating outflow €147k; financing inflow €2.498m. Operating spend alone understates cash consumption.

Sources & basis

Warrant exercise

35.0m shares

Reported 9 September 2026 · 35,000,009 warrant shares and £105k proceeds; admission expected around 14 September, not confirmed by this notice

September 2026 · £105k proceeds

Expected post-admission capital: 1,630,311,006 shares. Options and warrants need a reconciled register.

Sources & basis

Exercise of Warrants

Funding, obligations and dilution: full evidence and reconciliations

Acquisition cost is not the placing

Reported 29 January 2026 · Acquisition and contractual terms announced; payment deadlines are contractual, not proof of current unpaid balances

Purchase consideration was £2.032m: 305m shares at 0.4p (£1.220m) plus £812k cash. Cash terms were £375k initial, £242k due by 31 December 2026 and £195k by 31 December 2027. The £1.7m gross placing was a separate funding transaction.

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Fundraise and Use of Proceeds; Consideration

Resource trigger is only a contract term

Reported 29 January 2026 · Acquisition and contractual terms announced; payment deadlines are contractual, not proof of current unpaid balances

£390k of deferred cash accelerates if an inferred resource of at least 20 Mlb U₃O₈ at minimum 120 ppm is published under JORC or NI 43-101. This is not a Mineral Resource, an Exploration Target or a management estimate of likely inventory.

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Consideration footnote

Two different cash dates

As at 30 June 2026 · €1.069m period-end balance

Reported 16 September 2026 · Approximately €650k described as current cash; exact treasury measurement date not separately disclosed

June 2026 period-end cash was €1.069m. The 16 September interim also reported current cash of about €650k and said current planned programmes were funded. Neither number is a verified 30 September treasury balance or funding for an enlarged programme.

Sources & basis

Interim Results — Corporate highlights; consolidated statement of financial position

Exploration spend matters

Period ended 30 June 2026 · Six months ended; all cash-flow and loss figures in this claim

In the first half of 2026, operating cash use was €147k, investing outflow €1.590m and financing inflow €2.498m. The €947k loss includes a €455k non-cash option charge. Operating outflow alone understates total cash consumption.

Sources & basis

Interim Results — Cash-flow statement and corporate highlights

Funding remains a workstream

As at 31 December 2025 · Irish licence commitments €54,875 over two years

Period ended 31 December 2025 · Annual audited accounts and going-concern assessment

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later statement on funding the currently planned programmes

The 2025 audit contains an unmodified opinion with a material uncertainty related to going concern, dependent on additional finance. Annual note23 records €54,875 Irish licence commitments over two years and potential dilution if Stonepark cash calls are not met. The interim’s current programme funding statement has a narrower scope.

Source · p. 25 ↗Source ↗

Sources & basis

Annual report 2025 · Interim Results — Annual PDF pp25–26 and55; interim corporate / Stonepark discussion

Dilution and equity compensation

Reported 9 September 2026 · 35,000,009 warrant shares and £105k proceeds; admission expected around 14 September, not confirmed by this notice

As at 1 April 2026 · Option transaction date in the PDMR appendix

Reported 2 April 2026 · 130m options announced; interim narrative instead says granted on 2 April

September warrant exercise added 35,000,009 shares at 0.3p for £105k, with expected post-admission capital of 1,630,311,006. April’s 130m options at 0.95p replace earlier management/director options; they are not issued shares. A current full warrant schedule remains required.

Sources & basis

Exercise of Warrants · Warrant Exercise, Director Shareholdings & Options — September TVR; April options terms

Ireland and Botswana only as corporate context

Period ended 31 December 2025 · Annual commitments and cash-call terms

Reported 16 September 2026 · Stonepark programme funding and Botswana plans

The interim describes partner-funded Stonepark drilling at no cash cost to Arkle for that programme. This should be read alongside dilution/cash-call terms. Botswana first drilling depends on completion of its environmental assessment and corporate priorities; neither asset is included in the uranium scene.

Sources & basis

Interim Results · Annual report 2025 — Interim CEO comment and annual note23

Cash and liabilities need dated definitions

As at 30 June 2026 · All balance-sheet, payables and accrued remuneration figures

Reported 16 September 2026 · Separate approximately €650k current-cash statement; exact measurement date not disclosed

At 30 June 2026, the interim reports net current liabilities of about €62 k, including €886 k trade/other payables and a €266 k warrant accounting liability. Payables include €507 k deferred consideration and €203, 141 accrued director remuneration. The warrant liability is not simply a cash loan. Neither period-end balances nor the 16 September ~€650 k cash statement establish September 30 runway.

Sources & basis

Interim Results — Statement of financial position; note 8 Trade and other payables

Option note needs correction by the issuer

Period ended 30 June 2026 · Interim option roll-forward and valuation table

Reported 2 April 2026 · Option terms; appendix transaction date 1 April 2026

The interim option roll-forward shows opening 13.6 m, granted 130 m and cancelled 13.6 m, but a closing row 16.1 m; narrative and exercisable row state 130 m. The valuation table also appears to interchange the 0.575 p share price and 0.95 p exercise price relative to the April announcement. Do not calculate fully diluted capital from this inconsistent table; obtain the current option/warrant register.

Sources & basis

Interim Results · Warrant Exercise, Director Shareholdings & Options — Interim share-based payments note; April option terms

Programme funding is narrower than expansion funding

Reported 29 January 2026 · Placing, adviser and acquisition shares; contractual cash due 31 December 2026 and 31 December 2027

Reported 9 September 2026 · Warrant exercise proceeds and expected admission

Reported 16 September 2026 · Later funding statement; not a current unpaid-obligations confirmation

The January 425 m placing shares raised £1.7 m gross, with 7.5 m adviser shares and 305 m acquisition shares separately issued. September’s 35, 000, 009 warrant shares add £105 k at 0.3 p, not a new placement. Outstanding acquisition cash is £242 k due December 2026 and £195 k December 2027, subject to acceleration terms. A costed next programme, currency-specific obligations and cash-date bridge are needed before a runway estimate.

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing · Exercise of Warrants · Interim Results — Fundraise, consideration and share capital disclosures

Share admission notices also need reconciliation

Reported 27 February 2026 · Expected post-admission capital

Reported 13 March 2026 · Later expected post-admission capital; arithmetic discrepancy retained

Period ended 30 June 2026 · H1 warrant issues/proceeds and June closing capital

The 27 February notice states post-admission capital of 1,478,977,664. Adding the 14,333,333 shares announced on 13 March would produce 1,493,310,997, while that notice states 1,483,310,997. Retain the discrepancy rather than repairing a historical cap table. The interim separately reports 126,333,333 warrant shares and £433,000 proceeds in H1; its June closing capital is 1,595,310,997.

Sources & basis

Warrants Exercise & Website Launch · Exercise of Warrants · Interim Results — Formal warrant/admission bodies; interim financial position and share capital

People behind the programme

Rory Harding

Chief Executive Officer

Company strategy and programme priorities.

Sources & basis

Reported 16 September 2026 · Role identified in this disclosure

John Teeling

Chairman

Board and corporate oversight.

Sources & basis

Reported 16 September 2026 · Role identified in this disclosure

Aron Haludilu

Namibia country lead

Disclosed Namibia team counterpart.

Sources & basis

Reported 29 January 2026 · Role identified in this disclosure

Willem Kotzé

Namibia Exploration Manager

Exploration programme and field evidence.

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated

Sources & basis

Reported 22 May 2026 · Role identified in this disclosure

Dr Guy Freemantle

The MSA Group · Qualified Person

Approved September technical content; technical sign-off for the cited disclosure.

Sources & basis

Reported 14 September 2026 · Role identified in this disclosure

Technical contributors

Geophysics and geological interpretation

Arrow Geosciences: airborne processing. Theo Aravanis: geophysics interpretation. Paul Nex and Judith Kinnaird: geological input.

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated

Sources & basis

Reported 22 May 2026 · Role identified in this disclosure

Disclosed roles and review responsibilities

Suggested review counterparts

Reported 29 January 2026 · Namibia counterpart and acquisition roles

Reported 14 September 2026 · Technical sign-off

Reported 16 September 2026 · CEO and chairman roles

Rory Harding (CEO) and John Teeling (Chairman) are the commercial entry points; the Namibia team and country lead Aron Haludilu should own database transfer. Dr Guy Freemantle of The MSA Group approved September technical content; ask the company to nominate its technical sign-off owner.

Sources & basis

Interim Results · Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing · Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Enquiries; acquisition consideration and team; Qualified Person statement

Technical review has named counterparts

Reported 22 May 2026 · Named technical contributors and roles

Reported 14 September 2026 · September technical sign-off

May identifies Willem Kotzé as Namibia Exploration Manager; Arrow Geosciences processed airborne data, Theo Aravanis interpreted geophysics, and Paul Nex/Judith Kinnaird supplied geological input. Guy Freemantle of MSA signs the technical content. These disclosed roles identify potential review owners; no unsupported management-quality score is assigned.

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated · Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Technical team and Qualified Person sections

06 / DATED MARKET CONTEXT

Price & key developments

0.725p · 29 September 2026 close

Unadjusted daily close; local-currency price return; indexed first common session=100. Not total return, FX-adjusted return or causal attribution. GLD is a US gold ETF; URA is a US uranium/nuclear-equity ETF, not spot uranium. Both are broad context, not matched peers.

View

Select a disclosure to see its evidenceQuality not assessed · dated research snapshot

Company disclosures 7 events

-15.24% event-day close · -15.24% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-02-05. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 29 January 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Return basis: prior close 28 January 2026 → event close 29 January 2026; later window ends 5 February 2026.

+7.69% event-day close · +15.38% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-06-01. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated

Sources & basis

Return basis: prior close 21 May 2026 → event close 22 May 2026; later window ends 1 June 2026.

+7.69% event-day close · +3.85% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-07-02. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 25 June 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Namibia Uranium Exploration Update

Sources & basis

Return basis: prior close 24 June 2026 → event close 25 June 2026; later window ends 2 July 2026.

+0.00% event-day close · +0.00% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-07-24. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 17 July 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Namibia Uranium Drilling Underway

Sources & basis

Return basis: prior close 16 July 2026 → event close 17 July 2026; later window ends 24 July 2026.

-7.14% event-day close · -3.57% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-09-16. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 9 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Exercise of Warrants

Return basis: prior close 8 September 2026 → event close 9 September 2026; later window ends 16 September 2026.

+3.85% event-day close · +23.08% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-09-21. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Return basis: prior close 11 September 2026 → event close 14 September 2026; later window ends 21 September 2026.

+0.00% event-day close · +7.41% over five sessions

From the preceding close; five-session endpoint 2026-09-23. Observed movement, not causal attribution.

Reported 16 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Return basis: prior close 15 September 2026 → event close 16 September 2026; later window ends 23 September 2026.

Sources & basis

ARK.L daily market data · URA daily market data — Daily timestamp and closing-price series; first common session = 100

Announcement-window returns and methods

Return = (closing price ÷ previous-session close − 1) × 100. Later return uses five subsequent available sessions, or fewer where the series ends. Thin trading, spreads, other news and financing can affect these observations; this is not an impact attribution model.

Disclosure	Prior → event close (p)	Day	Later window	Sources
2026-09-16 Interim results and cash update	0.675 → 0.675	+0.0%	+7.4% 5 later sessions to 2026-09-23	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Interim Results · ARK.L daily market data
2026-09-14 Trench assays and completed drilling	0.65 → 0.675	+3.8%	+23.1% 5 later sessions to 2026-09-21	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target · ARK.L daily market data
2026-09-09 Warrant exercise and TVR	0.7 → 0.65	-7.1%	-3.6% 5 later sessions to 2026-09-16	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Exercise of Warrants · ARK.L daily market data
2026-07-17 Drilling underway	0.75 → 0.75	+0.0%	+0.0% 5 later sessions to 2026-07-24	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Namibia Uranium Drilling Underway · ARK.L daily market data
2026-06-25 Mapping and trenching update	0.65 → 0.7	+7.7%	+3.8% 5 later sessions to 2026-07-02	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Namibia Uranium Exploration Update · ARK.L daily market data
2026-05-22 Targets defined; drilling accelerated	0.65 → 0.7	+7.7%	+15.4% 5 later sessions to 2026-06-01	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated · ARK.L daily market data
2026-01-29 Namibia acquisition and placing	0.525 → 0.445	-15.2%	-15.2% 5 later sessions to 2026-02-05	Source ↗Source ↗ Sources & basis Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing · ARK.L daily market data

07 / RESEARCH LIBRARY

Discoveries are counted separately from review.

Repository guidance → Arkle questions → primary evidence → findings and visual implications. Draft-derived questions are explicitly labelled; active packs govern extraction.

93Discovered records

84Captured

41Selected-section review

3Full-document review

Selected-source audit only: 2 partial captures, 7 inaccessible records, 2 registered duplicates and 47 unread records. Figure review does not count as full-document review.

Search documentsReview statusAccess

Open searchable source and document-review register

Document	Access / review	Review scope / limitation	Local capture
Regulatory archive archive · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	captured selected sections	Dated headline discovery and cutoff check; linked articles reviewed only where individually registered.	Captured original Extracted text
Issuer home issuer-home · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	partially captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Issuer sitemap issuer-sitemap · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Annual report 2024 annual-2024 · 2025-06Source ↗	inaccessible unread	404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://arkleresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Arkle-Annual-Report-2024-1.pdf	Not recovered
Namibia Geological and Mineral Information System namibia-gmis · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	inaccessible unread	HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.mme.gov.na', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /edn/ (Caused by NameResolutionError("<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x103313b90>: Failed to resolve 'www.mme.gov.na' ([Errno 8] nodename nor servname provided, or not known)"))	Not recovered
Interim Results rns-9773898 · 2026-09-16Source ↗	captured full	Full formal issuer interim body including financial statements and notes (third-party AI preamble excluded)	Captured original Extracted text
Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target rns-9769143 · 2026-09-14Source ↗	captured full	Entire issuer announcement text, tables, glossary/qualified-person statement and Figures1–2; host navigation and host-generated AI summary excluded from issuer evidence	Captured original Extracted text
Exercise of Warrants rns-9761835 · 2026-09-09Source ↗	captured selected sections	September TVR; April options terms	Captured original Extracted text
Admission to OTCID Basic Market in United States rns-9697123 · 2026-07-31Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Result of AGM rns-9684851 · 2026-07-23Source ↗	captured full	Full formal issuer AGM announcement including substantive uranium and corporate update (third-party AI preamble excluded)	Captured original Extracted text
Stonepark Zinc Update: New Zone Discovered rns-9683933 · 2026-07-23Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Namibia Uranium Drilling Underway rns-9673552 · 2026-07-17Source ↗	captured selected sections	Dated announcement: Drilling underway	Captured original Extracted text
Notice of Annual General Meeting rns-9659726 · 2026-07-09Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Holding(s) in Company rns-9657055 · 2026-07-07Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Rescheduling of Investor Webcast rns-9648459 · 2026-07-02Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Publication of Annual Report and Accounts rns-9641824 · 2026-06-29Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Notice of Investor Webcast rns-9640593 · 2026-06-29Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Namibia Uranium Exploration Update rns-9635389 · 2026-06-25Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal programme, trench sampling, legacy relogging and technical sections	Captured original Extracted text
Preliminary Results for Year Ended 31 Dec 2025 rns-9630731 · 2026-06-23Source ↗	captured selected sections	Chairman and Namibia post-balance-sheet sections; not full financial review	Captured original Extracted text
Exercise of Warrants and TVR rns-9607462 · 2026-06-08Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Appointment of Joint Broker rns-9598431 · 2026-06-03Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Director Dealing rns-9583901 · 2026-05-26Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated rns-9581203 · 2026-05-22Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal Phase1 results, next steps and technical team; all substantive sections	Captured original Extracted text
Exercise of Warrants rns-9562906 · 2026-05-12Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Director Dealing rns-9533759 · 2026-04-23Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Appointment of Nominated & Financial Adviser rns-9526436 · 2026-04-17Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Stonepark Zinc Project – Operations Update rns-9524046 · 2026-04-16Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Stonepark Zinc Project – Operations Update rns-9524016 · 2026-04-16Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Warrant Exercise, Director Shareholdings & Options rns-9504442 · 2026-04-02Source ↗	captured selected sections	September TVR; April options terms	Captured original Extracted text
Total Voting Rights rns-9504134 · 2026-04-01Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Uranium Updates - Geophysical Surveys Complete rns-9501735 · 2026-04-01Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal uranium survey completion body, line spacing, line-km and historical holes	Captured original Extracted text
Exercise of Warrants rns-9483051 · 2026-03-19Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Exercise of Warrants rns-9474235 · 2026-03-13Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Stonepark Zinc Project - Drilling Update rns-9473885 · 2026-03-13Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Total Voting Rights rns-9454331 · 2026-03-02Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Warrants Exercise & Website Launch rns-9449878 · 2026-02-27Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal issuer warrant exercise / admission / director purchase body; enquiries and ancillary notification forms excluded	Captured original Extracted text
Uranium Exploration Commenced in Namibia rns-9447653 · 2026-02-26Source ↗	captured selected sections	Formal uranium programme and geophysics body	Captured original Extracted text
Company Updates rns-9441309 · 2026-02-23Source ↗	captured selected sections	Namibia strategy,178samples, planned vscompleted surveys; Botswana/Irish corporate context selected sections	Captured original Extracted text
Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing rns-9392626 · 2026-01-29Source ↗	captured selected sections	Acquisition and consideration sections; About Namibia Uranium; 2025 sampling and laboratory method; Acquisition sampling table; presentation PDF pp21,23; Fundraise and Use of Proceeds; Consideration; Consideration footnote; Enquiries; acquisition consideration and team; Qualified Person statement	Captured original Extracted text
Update on Stonepark rns-9241707 · 2025-11-18Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Holdings in Company rns-9226545 · 2025-11-11Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
Interim Statement rns-9130082 · 2025-09-25Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Result of Annual General Meeting rns-9012969 · 2025-07-30Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Placing to raise £500,000 rns-9011298 · 2025-07-30Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
New Prospecting Licence Awarded in Botswana rns-8969827 · 2025-07-09Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Final Results for the Year Ended 31 December 2024 rns-8946148 · 2025-06-25Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Update on Stonepark Zinc Project, Ireland rns-8931472 · 2025-06-16Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Lithium and Magnesium Identified in Botswana rns-8750467 · 2025-02-25Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Refocus of Activities on Stonepark Zinc Licence rns-8725558 · 2025-02-06Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Drilling Update on the Stonepark Zinc Project rns-8690169 · 2025-01-15Source ↗	captured unread	Outside uranium technical scope; retained, unread unless marked otherwise. No transfer of resources or results to Namibia.	Captured original Extracted text
Regulatory archive page 2 archive-2 · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	captured selected sections	Dated headline discovery and cutoff check; linked articles reviewed only where individually registered.	Captured original Extracted text
Corporate presentation linked from uranium page presentation · 2026-04-02Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF pp18–24: licence context, historical samples, exploration programme; key maps visually inspected	Captured original Extracted text
Annual report 2025 annual-2025 · 2026-06-29Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF pp25–26,55–56: auditor going concern, commitments, acquisition and options	Captured original Extracted text
Annual report 2024 current website copy annual-2024-current · 2025-06Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target – issuer feed issuer-ulg · 2026-09-14Source ↗	captured duplicate	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Interim Results – issuer feed issuer-interim · 2026-09-16Source ↗	captured duplicate	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
Issuer regulatory feed issuer-feed · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	partially captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
EPL8290 environmental management plan emp-8290 · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	inaccessible unread	HTTPSConnectionPool(host='eia.meft.gov.na', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /screening/5720_epl8290_updated_esmp_180622.pdf (Caused by ConnectTimeoutError(<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x108b19410>, 'Connection to eia.meft.gov.na timed out. (connect timeout=35)'))	Not recovered
EPL7986 environmental management plan emp-7986 · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	inaccessible unread	HTTPSConnectionPool(host='eia.meft.gov.na', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /screening/5719_updated_emp_epl_7986.pdf (Caused by ConnectTimeoutError(<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x108b1a4d0>, 'Connection to eia.meft.gov.na timed out. (connect timeout=35)'))	Not recovered
Namibia Uranium environmental application record eia-project · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	inaccessible unread	HTTPSConnectionPool(host='eia.meft.gov.na', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /web/projects/5739 (Caused by ConnectTimeoutError(<urllib3.connection.HTTPSConnection object at 0x108b19dd0>, 'Connection to eia.meft.gov.na timed out. (connect timeout=35)'))	Not recovered
EIS environmental report catalogue eis-index · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
5739_EMP_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-0 · 2025Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF pp1–2,7–10: document scope, target waypoints, source-map inconsistencies	Captured original Extracted text
5739_Declaration of Authorship_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-1 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
5739_Environmental Audit_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-2 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
5739_ECC Old_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-3 · 2025Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF p1 visually: former holder, issue and expiry dates; remaining scan not reviewed	Captured original Extracted text
5739_Map_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-4 · 2025Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF p1 target coordinates; compared with EMP Table 2	Captured original Extracted text
5739_Screening Notice_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-5 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
5739_CV_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf eis-8298-6 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
EPL7986 5719_EMP_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf eis-7986-68 · 2025Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF pp1,7–9: scope, target waypoints and renewal status	Captured original Extracted text
EPL7986 5719_Declaration of Authorship_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf eis-7986-69 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
EPL7986 5719_ECC Old_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf eis-7986-70 · 2025Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF p1 visually: former holder, issue and expiry dates; remaining scan not reviewed	Captured original Extracted text
EPL7986 5719_Map_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf eis-7986-71 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
EPL7986 5719_Screening Notice_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf eis-7986-72 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Captured/indexed only; not read for substantive claims.	Captured original Extracted text
EPL7986 5719_CV_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf eis-7986-73 · 2025Source ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
EPL8290 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment eis-8290-esia · 2022Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF p1 and contents: draft 2022 ESIA identity; substantive impact chapters not reviewed	Captured original Extracted text
ARK.L daily market data market-ARK.L · 2026-09-30Source ↗	captured selected sections	Currency, daily timestamps, closing prices, volume; invalid/null and cutoff-day bars excluded	Captured original
URA daily market data market-URA · 2026-09-30Source ↗	captured selected sections	Currency, daily timestamps, closing prices, volume; invalid/null and cutoff-day bars excluded	Captured original
2555_ESR_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-20 · 2023-12-18Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF pp12,21,28,41,55: 8026→8995 history, rights access, legislation and heritage assessment wording	Captured original Extracted text
2555_ESMP_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-21 · 2023-12Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF p9: history and environmental application purpose	Captured original Extracted text
2555_ECC Old_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-22 · 2022-10-17Source ↗	captured selected sections	All one-page certificate visually reviewed; reverse-side conditions not supplied	Captured original Extracted text
2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-23 · 2023-08-01Source ↗	captured selected sections	All 8 scanned pages visually reviewed: preparedness notice, signed acceptance, conditions and duplicate coordinate appendices	Captured original Extracted text
2555_Proof of Consultation_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-24 · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	captured unread	Captured attachment; no substantive review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
2555_Map_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-25 · 2023-12Source ↗	captured selected sections	One-page map visually reviewed: stated GCS WGS1984, centre, extent; not current legal control	Captured original Extracted text
2555_NHC Consent_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-26 · 2023-08-23Source ↗	captured selected sections	All 3 pages visually reviewed: consent names EPL8024/Parkland, not8995; validity ends22Aug2024	Captured original Extracted text
2555_Screening Notice_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-27 · 2024-01-19Source ↗	captured selected sections	Both pages reviewed: screening/application verification and further document requests, not final clearance	Captured original Extracted text
2555_CV_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-28 · Publication date unconfirmedSource ↗	captured unread	Excluded from uranium technical inference; headline triage only. Retained for future governance/capital chronology; no full review claimed.	Captured original Extracted text
2555_BID_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf eis-8995-29 · 2023Source ↗	captured selected sections	PDF p3 project history; rest not reviewed	Captured original Extracted text
CIM Mineral Exploration Best Practice Guidelines 2018 cim-exploration-2018 · 2018-11-23Source ↗	captured selected sections	Sampling, survey and QA/QC guidance selected sections; draft numerical bands not endorsed	Captured original Extracted text
Copernicus GLO30 + Sentinel-2 geographic context copernicus-context · 2026-09-30Source ↗	captured selected sections	Provider CRS, raster footprint, elevation units and SCL local clear fraction; not geological interpretation	Captured original
Four-licence geographic context: Copernicus GLO30 / Sentinel-2 mosaic copernicus-context-v3Source ↗	captured selected_sections	Provider CRS, coverage, EGM2008 units, acquisition dates and SCL clear-pixel mosaic; not surveyed exploration registration	Context provenance
Earth Data Namibia public archive portal edn-portal-v3Source ↗	inaccessible unread	Indexed official description is a discovery lead; archive contents and Arkle coverage not verified.	Access failed; see research audit
GSN2023: A Geoscientific Data Base for Namibia edn-paper-v3Source ↗	inaccessible unread	Indexed official description is a discovery lead; archive contents and Arkle coverage not verified.	Access failed; see research audit
ULG geographic context and approximate map registration geographic-ulg-v4Source ↗	captured selected_sections	Local satellite/DSM, internal map-grid fit and approximate alignment limits; no survey validation	Registration review

Version0003 research findings and limitations

Arkle version 0003 — research and reconstruction findings

Evidence cutoff: 30 September 2026. Public information only. This is an extension of the selected-source version 0002 audit, not a complete historical drilling or tenure audit.

What the additional research recovered

The original presentation contains embedded maps larger than the rendered page previews: pages 20 and21 are1733×975 pixels; the page 22 sampling map is652×734 and geology map556×626; the page 23 context map is1084×975. These source pixels are preserved under assets/v3. Their sample classes, bank interpretations, target boundaries, geological colours and labelled results support additional selectable geometry. The map backgrounds have no disclosed satellite acquisition date and are kept separate from the newly acquired dated geographic imagery. Issuer presentation

The publisher's original June map is594×449 pixels, and September programme/ULG maps are477×418 and476×416. Fetching the original attachments did not reveal hidden high-resolution collar tables. Low-resolution marks can merge, so the reconstructed symbol fragments are not a count of unique holes or laboratory samples. The source imagery remains visible in Compare and available as a direct download.

The June release supports five named historical intervals: VB05,2.7 m at99.5 ppm from0.4 m; VB06,2.7 m at100 ppm from0.4 m; RC08,4.4 m at133.9 ppm from4 m; RC28,1 m at303 ppm from6.5 m; RC27,2 m at215 ppm from15.5 m. The figure labels U3O8 without an e, while the announcement identifies the method as downhole gamma-ray spectrometry and defines eU3O8. The viewer therefore labels these as radiometric equivalents, not chemical assays. The VB05/VB06 rings are close and their callouts overlap; the paired symbols are not forcibly assigned individual identities. RC27/RC28 positions were not recovered. June announcement

Five shared-scale downhole interval columns can be drawn without inventing a trajectory. The unreported portions of the holes are unknown, not barren intervals. No total hole depth, dip, azimuth, collar RL or complete downhole survey was recovered for these five records. The unnamed9.4 m central-east interval remains unpositioned because its from-depth and identity are missing.

Nine modern ULG collar-symbol/label associations are retained from version 0002. The September release gives programme ranges of70–200 m depth and−60° to−90° dip, and reports four deviation surveys. Those ranges cannot be assigned to individual holes. Chemical assay results and calibrated gamma values for the modern holes were not recovered through the cutoff. The hole register leaves those fields null. September announcement

Public research routes and remaining access gaps

Issuer acquisition, technical updates, interim statements, presentation and original RNS image attachments: source and named-hole searches were extended. No complete collar/orientation/EOH/survey table or underlying Namibia NI43-101 report was recovered. The acquisition budgets an updated report; this does not establish that an older report is publicly available.
Geological Survey of Namibia / Earth Data Namibia: indexed official publications establish an archive of exploration reports and drill records. The live portal and2023 publication could not be captured because of DNS/fetch failures. It is a specific next retrieval route, not evidence that Arkle's holes are present or absent. GSN archive paper
Historical operators and consultants: searches followed Namibia Uranium, Oakridge Vision, Chris Healey, Terratec and the named holes. No original operator-to-hole chain was established. Neighbouring-company drill records were excluded unless ownership and spatial overlap could be demonstrated.
Environmental appendices: additional selected passages of the7986 and8298 management/audit packages describe reconnaissance, sample collection and siting drill points. They do not supply a completed drill database. Template references to other EPL numbers remain warnings against transferring an annex indiscriminately. The earlier8995/8026 tenure findings remain unchanged.
Duplicate distributions: OTC's June RNS body was readable through web retrieval, but the separate direct capture failed. It is a duplicate of the existing captured issuer announcement, not a new drilling dataset. October2025 licence-list retrieval also failed and cannot confirm September2026 title.

Access attempts are preserved in captures/v3/access-audit.json; original image URLs and dimensions are in captures/v3/original-image-downloads.json. These attempts do not increase full-document review counts.

Figure-level findings and limits

ULG map: additional result callouts146,307,278 and180 ppm are retained with source-pixel endpoints. Exact sample IDs and sample support remain unresolved. The800,358 and362 ppm callouts from version 0002 remain. A362 ppm map label is a sample-linkage question, not proof of contradiction with a trench-only358 ppm maximum.
Paleo East: selective surface classes, three labelled surface values, and partial interpreted channel banks are reconstructed. Category boundaries are copied as printed, without inventing endpoint inclusion rules or treating selected grades as deposit averages.
HLEM: source plan traverses and12.5 m/16 m depth annotations are interpreted geophysical evidence. The caption's12.5 m potential maximum does not reconcile the16 m figure label. Neither is uranium thickness.
Regional targets: dated licence and target outlines are native linework. Source radiometric colours represent U counts per second; no assay grades are assigned to that raster.
Geology: eight conservative colour fragments from the source map remain flat polygons, with label/occlusion holes preserved. Boundaries outside recoverable colour cores remain in Original/Compare. No surface is interpolated between these fragments.
North Rössing: the licence outline and partial dome trace are geological context, not a solid. The sample figure prints2924 ppm; acquisition prose reports2923 ppm. Both values remain source-specific and unresolved.

Coordinate and display methods

Every exploration drawing remains source-local. Horizontal coordinate labels alone do not prove datum, elevation reference or surveyed registration. Independent holdout controls have not been recovered, so these layers are not draped onto the geographic terrain.

Copernicus GLO30 terrain and September2026 Sentinel-2 imagery share an explicit projected EPSG32733 frame. The DSM is EGM2008 metres and displayed at vertical exaggeration1. Its2011–2015 acquisition period differs from the satellite dates. This is regional surface context, not a surveyed collar-elevation source. The regional coverage is14.3–15.4°E and22.65–21.65°S; individual licence camera presets are display choices, not cadastral boundaries. Provider alignment does not validate Arkle's drawings.

The source-image checklist records partial reconstruction and omissions. Pixel tolerance is a tracing uncertainty, not ground accuracy. Native geometry, picking and SVG use the same feature coordinates. Geometry and public-source metadata remain separate from presentation colours and camera state.

Repository grounding

Active drill-results extraction rules govern interval cardinality, units, null missing metadata and the separation of programme intent from completed results. Active general/cross-context guidance prevents restated results, unrelated zones and incompatible sample populations being treated as new comparable evidence. Resource guidance prevents targets becoming resources or solids. Exploration-results and exploration-intelligence drafts guide questions about coverage, bias, methods and controls; no draft scoring bands are adopted. Matrix rowsM11–M13 link these questions to the actual sources and viewer consequences.

Final display and label review

The modern map association retained as R006 is ambiguous between R006 and R060 at the source resolution; it is not a verified hole identity. Six weak June collar candidates were removed after enlarged source review. The geometry review register identifies each exclusion.

The Sentinel display uses B04/B03/B02, common white0.6 and power0.6 without per-channel white balance. All contributing STAC items declare the BOA offset already applied, so no second −0.1 offset is applied. The corrected display and metadata were finalized before freezing. See provider explanation, the bundled STAC items and rgb-correction.json. This processing is for visual context, not quantitative spectroscopy. Satellite pixel clarity does not validate exploration registration.

Version0003 before / after gap report

Version0002 → version 0003: visual and evidence gaps

Area	Before	Version0003	Remaining limit
Historical drilling	Named prose intervals without columns	Five selectable, shared-scale downhole interval columns;14-row hole register	Complete trajectory parameters unavailable
ULG plan	Sparse source-colour marks and nine collar symbols	More recoverable colour fragments and four additional labelled results; direct Original/Compare	Anonymous fragments are not a unique sample census
Modern fences	Three campaign-level markers	Additional source-symbol fragments within the East/West fence areas	Many merged/unreadable marks; no forced87-hole reconstruction
Paleo East	Two HLEM plan lines	June historical map, channel-bank traces, labelled depth interpretations and2025 sample classes	HLEM depth is not mineralised thickness
EPL8290	A single outline on an empty native plane	Rich presentation-map context with selectable targets, results and licence outlines	Source-local; current cadastral title not established
Geological mapping	Original map only	Eight flat geological fragments with preserved holes and source context	No underground geological solids
North Rössing	Environmental target waypoints	Dome/licence context and six labelled surface results	2924/2923 ppm source discrepancy unresolved
Satellite and terrain	Small separate context crop	Four licence presets plus regional context; dated bundled imagery and true-scale DSM	Drawing-to-geography controls missing
Interaction	Unfiltered target selector; hard-to-find terrain	Licence-filtered evidence selector, terrain button, close-focus zoom, depth-log selection, direct original links	Physical trackpad gestures require hardware verification
Research	Historical report gap	Named-hole searches, original attachment extraction, environmental appendix follow-up and documented GSN access failure	Archive coverage and historical operator chain unconfirmed

Version0001 and version 0002 are preserved. Market series, calculations, original financial assertions and baseline citation IDs remain unchanged. This update adds evidence views; it does not claim a complete document audit, a resource model, surveyed drill trajectories or current title confirmation.

08 / DATA THAT WOULD RESOLVE THE GAPS

Prioritized data request

A1 · Complete drilling, assays and downhole surveysP0 • first transfer

Connect all reported work to unique holes and samples; resolve contradictory totals.

Preferred format: CSV/native database: collars, downhole surveys, assays, QA/QC, geology, recovery; signed lab PDFs; historic source manifest
Validation: IDs, metres/EOH, duplicates, missing results, units and U→U₃O₈ conversion, detection limits, sample/QA/QC counts, dip convention, original coordinate datum/RL
Capability unlocked: Source-linked AI search across holes, samples and reports, with automated flags for missing records, conflicting totals and interval errors. Linked drill views connect geological logs and assay intervals to their original records only where collar, orientation and survey quality support them; the 106 legacy holes remain separate from the modern campaign.
Proposed owner: Exploration database owner / MSA technical reviewer

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 16 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target · Interim Results — Public evidence establishing the need; request is Minestarters’ proposal

Specific records
Include original VB05, VB06, RC08, RC27 and RC28 logs, the 87-hole modern master index, total depths, orientations, coordinate/RL metadata and survey stations. Resolve ambiguous map-label associations before treating them as verified IDs.

A2 · Gamma calibration and disequilibrium packageP0 • first transfer

Explain when eU₃O₈ agrees with chemical uranium and where it does not.

Preferred format: Raw probe LAS/CSV (channels/counts), calibration records, corrections, logging speed, hole diameter/water data, matched assays and disequilibrium studies
Validation: Depth alignment, dead-time/background/water/casing corrections, repeat logs, calibration dates, U/Th separation, uncertainty and eU/assay ratios
Capability unlocked: Depth-aligned comparison of chemical assays and radiometric estimates, with discrepancy flags and uncertainty for geophysicist review. Keep both measurement types distinct; flagged differences require calibration, borehole-condition and disequilibrium assessment before interpretation.
Proposed owner: Terratec / geophysicist / company technical lead

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Public evidence establishing the need; request is Minestarters’ proposal

A3 · Trench survey, geological logging and all surface samplesP0 • first transfer

Tie surface geology and geochemistry to specific locations and sample support.

Preferred format: Trench XYZ polylines, from/to channels, lithology/structure logs, photos, sample CSV, QA/QC certificates
Validation: Sample type and support; trench ID/chainage; grade units; composites; 271 analytical versus 242 field count; current/historical overlap; mapped contacts and orientation
Capability unlocked: Connected ULG surface-to-depth sections and a searchable sample inspector. Identify unsampled intervals and poorly tested contacts where further observations could resolve geological uncertainty, for review by Arkle’s geologists. Unsampled intervals remain unknown, not barren. Cross-sections require verified drilling, surveys and geological contacts.
Proposed owner: Field geology lead

Reported 14 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Extensive Uranium System Defined at ULG Target — Public evidence establishing the need; request is Minestarters’ proposal

Specific records
Provide all trench stations and sample IDs, native trench polylines, geological contacts, sample support and the dispatch manifest. Resolve the 362/trench-maximum linkage and North Rössing 2,924/2,923 discrepancy.

A4 · Airborne/HLEM interpretation and legacy drillingP1

Keep measured geophysical responses distinguishable from targets.

Preferred format: Raw/processed grids and flight lines, HLEM observations/inversions, GeoPackage/DXF, survey/interpretation reports, legacy holes and technical report
Validation: CRS, survey vintage, sensor/line metadata, independent controls, legacy operator provenance, interpretation version and limitations
Capability unlocked: Explainable target comparison combining geology, geochemistry, geophysics and legacy drilling, with supporting evidence, contradictions and missing coverage visible. Assess ULG and palaeochannel targets separately. Predictive modelling remains conditional on adequate data and validation on withheld holes or spatial areas against geological baselines; Arkle’s geologists own target interpretation.
Proposed owner: Geophysics contractors / Namibia team

Reported 22 May 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 29 January 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗Source ↗

Sources & basis

Uranium Targets Defined; Drilling Accelerated · Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing — Public evidence establishing the need; request is Minestarters’ proposal

Specific records
Identify historical operators and GSN report/accession numbers. Public archive access failed during this review; Arkle coverage is unconfirmed.

A5 · Tenure, permissions and acquisition obligationsP0 • scope gate

Verify present title, permitted work and economic interest.

Preferred format: Certified EPLs and boundaries, current ECCs/conditions, holder transfers, minority/royalty agreements, acquisition payment schedule, land-access agreements and mapped exploration restrictions; signed EPL 8995 instruments and correct heritage consent, native GIS and surveyed control with datum/epoch
Validation: Old-vs-new holder and expiry; nuclear-fuel mineral endorsements; access conditions; 85/15 interest and carry; accelerated payment terms; spatial extent and effective dates of access restrictions; 8026→8995 instrument linkage, exclusion of unrelated 8024 heritage attachment, Bessel 1841/WGS 84 transformation and independent holdout residuals against source resolution
Capability unlocked: Company-reviewed licence and permissions register, obligations calendar and mapped exploration access constraints to inform programme planning. Current title, environmental conditions and land-access permissions require company confirmation before proposed work is treated as accessible. Register geographic overlays only after coordinate-control validation.
Proposed owner: Company secretary / country manager / legal adviser / surveyor

Reported 29 January 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 2025 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 18 December 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 1 August 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 23 August 2023 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Sources & basis

Acquisition of Namibia Uranium and £1.7m Placing · 5739_ECC Old_EPL 8298 Trekopje Erongo Region.pdf · EPL7986 5719_ECC Old_EPL 7986 Arandis.pdf · 2555_ESR_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_MME Grant_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf · 2555_NHC Consent_EPL 8995 in Erongo Region.pdf — Public evidence establishing the need; request is Minestarters’ proposal

Specific records
Provide native GIS, datum/projection/epoch, vertical datum and spatially distributed independent holdout controls. An approximate public-map overlay is not survey control.

A6 · Current liquidity, cap table and next programmeP1

Align the room with decisions the team can fund.

Preferred format: Dated treasury/commitments summary, options/warrants register and approved programme budget; geologist-proposed campaign options with locations, metres, contractor costs, access constraints and geological objectives
Validation: Outstanding deferred cash, gross/net raises, warrant receipts, Irish cash-call exposure, programme scope and contingency; comparable cost assumptions, proposed metres, access dependencies and geological questions addressed
Capability unlocked: Compare geologist-proposed drilling and trenching campaigns by cost, metres, access and geological objectives alongside funding commitments. Support a funded milestone plan and issuer-reviewed sharing material; Arkle’s geologists retain ownership of drilling decisions.
Proposed owner: Finance Director / CEO

Reported 16 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 9 September 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed

Reported 29 June 2026 · Disclosure date; underlying observation date not separately disclosed